reason for admonishing
the
that he might
Case was in order to be
guided in his decision
guided
the result
the
by
properly
not day
case; (and it is not to reconcile M. Wodehouse's
Subsequent assignment of
a different reason with his
previous statements
acting
The Attorney General appears to have
acted strictly within his powers in "directing a nolle prosequi
in the case
the Charge of perjury;
and as
M. Wodehouse was not concerned with that case, it should
not have been introduced
into his memorial
M. Wodehouse
appears to have considered that it
was of little
consequence
whether he committed or
discharged the prisoners,
the responsibility
would rest with the
Council.
The Governor
He will, however, have
learned from the judgement
of the Supreme Court, that
it was his duty
to
the magistrate should exercise his judgement as to whether
the evidence established a
?
reason for adfomning
the
that he might
Case was in order to be
uided in his decision
guided
the result
the
by
perpary
· not day
case; (and it is not to reconcile M. Wodehouse's
Subsequent assignment of
a different reason with his
porins statements
-acting
Fontier The Attorney quand affers to have
Father a caute
Λ
Aix strictly within his powers in "directing a nolle
prosequi
in the case
the Charge of of perjury;
f
Subornation
and as
mi
Wide house was not concerned with that case, it should
not have been introduced
into his memorial 207
.8.4 m2- Wodehouse
afficare
to have considered that it
was of
little
Consequence
Whe tire he committed or
dishanged the prisoners,
the responsibility
Assura as
If deciding
Whether they
should be surrendered would
lest with the
Council.
the governor
He will, however, have
koured from the judgement
of the Supreme Court, that
is the it was his pluty
His
04
to
the magistrate behould exercise his judgement as to whether
the evidence established a
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.